Canada · QC · ca-qc-marriage_contract-2026-09-12.1

Québec

Quebec marriage contract research: Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443. Unmarried default: civil code no family patrimony.

Liste de contrôle · Examiner · C$69

Québec a son propre dossier de contrat de mariage. Quebec marriage contract research: Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443. Unmarried default: civil code no family patrimony. Ce n'est pas un prenup américain et ce n'est pas le droit d'une province voisine recopié.

Québec a aussi un dossier de contrat de vie commune. Les conjoints de fait n'entrent pas dans le patrimoine familial par la cohabitation. This pack is the cohabitation track. Do not treat it as a marriage contract or as Swedish samboavtal.

Les deux instruments restent séparés à dessein. Un fichier intitulé prenup doit encore être classé comme contrat de mariage ou contrat de vie commune selon l'état civil des parties et la forme Québec.

contrat de mariage

Contrat de mariage.

formalitiesstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Marriage-contract form

A marriage contract is made by notarial act, except where the Code permits another form. This is not Ontario witnessing and not a U.S. acknowledgment.

  • Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
  • If the file calls itself a prenup, the formation question is still this province’s marriage-contract form, not California Fam. Code or Sambolagen.
acknowledgmentstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Witnesses, notaries, and acknowledgements

A marriage contract is made by notarial act, except where the Code permits another form. This is not Ontario witnessing and not a U.S. acknowledgment.

  • Québec marriage contracts are typically notarial acts. An Ontario-style two-witness page is the wrong formality story.
propertystatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Default property regime for spouses

Default regime is partnership of acquests unless a marriage contract chooses another permitted regime. Family patrimony (family residence, furniture, vehicles, certain retirement rights) is a separate public-order mass.

  • The contract’s job is usually to modify or confirm that default, within what the statute lets parties do.
  • Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.
permitted subjectsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

What this instrument can try to cover

A marriage contract typically addresses property, debts, and sometimes support between spouses. Public-order limits (Québec family patrimony; child support everywhere) still apply.

  • Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.
spousal supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Support language versus support law

Support between spouses follows the Code and federal divorce law where applicable. A marriage contract is not a complete substitute for support analysis.

  • Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.
child supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Children are not ordinary contract subjects

Child support and parental authority are not ordinary contractual subjects. Flag any child waiver.

  • Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.
voluntarinessstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Setting aside, disclosure, and advice

Family patrimony rules are of public order. Spouses cannot opt out of family patrimony by a marriage contract the way common-law provinces let spouses contract around equalization. Lesion, consent, and notarial formalities are the Québec questions—not s. 56(4) FLA.

  • Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
  • Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.
financial disclosurestatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Financial disclosure as a fairness fact

Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.

  • If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.
limitationsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

What this pack will not invent

Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.

  • Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
  • Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.
independent counselstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Independent legal advice

Canadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.

  • Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.
timingstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Timing around the wedding

A first draft delivered immediately before a wedding is a voluntariness and understanding fact. Canada does not use a single U.S.-style statutory waiting period in these packs.

  • Effective-date language in the contract is not proof the statutory regime attached on that date.

contrat de vie commune

Contrat de vie commune.

formalitiesstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Cohabitation-agreement form

De facto spouses may make private agreements about property they own, but those writings are not a marriage contract and do not create the family patrimony.

  • Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
  • If the file calls itself a prenup while the parties are unmarried, classify it against this province’s cohabitation rules rather than renaming it a marriage contract.
acknowledgmentstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Witnesses and proof of the cohabitation writing

De facto spouses may make private agreements about property they own, but those writings are not a marriage contract and do not create the family patrimony.

  • Witnessing, if required, is a provincial formality. It is not a U.S. notary acknowledgment statute.
propertystatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Default property position if unmarried

De facto spouses do not enter family patrimony by cohabiting. Property follows title, ordinary contract, and unjust-enrichment ideas a lawyer may assess—not the married spouses’ family patrimony.

  • Do not assume the couple is already in a spouse-like property statute. Read this province’s trigger.
  • Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.
permitted subjectsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

What this instrument can try to cover

A cohabitation agreement typically addresses property and debts between unmarried partners. It cannot manufacture a statutory regime the province does not confer, and it cannot replace a will.

  • Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.
spousal supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Support language versus support law

Support between spouses follows the Code and federal divorce law where applicable. A marriage contract is not a complete substitute for support analysis.

  • Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.
child supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Children are not ordinary contract subjects

Child support and parental authority are not ordinary contractual subjects. Flag any child waiver.

  • Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.
voluntarinessstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Setting aside, disclosure, and advice

Family patrimony rules are of public order. Spouses cannot opt out of family patrimony by a marriage contract the way common-law provinces let spouses contract around equalization. Lesion, consent, and notarial formalities are the Québec questions—not s. 56(4) FLA.

  • Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
  • Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.
financial disclosurestatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Financial disclosure as a fairness fact

Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.

  • If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.
limitationsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

What this pack will not invent

Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.

  • Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
  • Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.
independent counselstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Independent legal advice

Canadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.

  • Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.
timingstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Timing around cohabitation or a later wedding

A cohabitation agreement signed years into a relationship, or a 'prenup' signed while unmarried just before a wedding, raises classification and transition questions. Marriage usually moves the couple onto the marriage-contract / marital-property statute.

  • If the parties later marry, a cohabitation agreement does not automatically become a marriage contract unless this province’s statute and the document’s form actually support that continuation.

Questions

Quel est le régime patrimonial par défaut pour les époux en Québec?

Default regime is partnership of acquests unless a marriage contract chooses another permitted regime. Family patrimony (family residence, furniture, vehicles, certain retirement rights) is a separate public-order mass.

Que se passe-t-il pour les conjoints de fait en Québec s'ils ne signent rien?

De facto spouses do not enter family patrimony by cohabiting. Property follows title, ordinary contract, and unjust-enrichment ideas a lawyer may assess—not the married spouses’ family patrimony.

Quelle forme l'écrit doit-il respecter?

A marriage contract is made by notarial act, except where the Code permits another form. This is not Ontario witnessing and not a U.S. acknowledgment.

Quand un tribunal peut-il écarter l'entente?

Family patrimony rules are of public order. Spouses cannot opt out of family patrimony by a marriage contract the way common-law provinces let spouses contract around equalization. Lesion, consent, and notarial formalities are the Québec questions—not s. 56(4) FLA.

Les enfants et les aliments?

Child support and parental authority are not ordinary contractual subjects. Flag any child waiver. Support between spouses follows the Code and federal divorce law where applicable. A marriage contract is not a complete substitute for support analysis.

Exemples

Un brouillon appelé prenup pour Québec

La question utile est de savoir s'il s'agit d'un contrat de mariage ou d'un contrat de vie commune selon que les parties sont mariées, sur le point de l'être, ou en union de fait. Les sources de Québec restent les seules citations autorisées.

Une clause copiée d'une autre province

Une clause d'égalisation ontarienne, de biens exclus britanno-colombiens ou de patrimoine familial québécois n'est pas interchangeable. Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.

Des annexes financières manquantes

Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.

Pour l'avocat

  • Ce texte respecte-t-il la forme du contrat de mariage en Québec?
  • Les parties sont-elles des conjoints de fait visés par la loi patrimoniale de Québec?
  • Qu'est-ce qui a été divulgué, et qui a eu un avis indépendant?
  • Une clause tente-t-elle de fixer la pension alimentaire pour enfants?