Canada · QC · ca-qc-marriage_contract-2026-09-12.1

Quebec

Quebec marriage contract research: Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443. Unmarried default: civil code no family patrimony.

Checklist · Review · C$69

Quebec has its own marriage-contract pack. Quebec marriage contract research: Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443. Unmarried default: civil code no family patrimony. This is not a U.S. prenup and it is not a neighbouring province’s statute with the names swapped.

Quebec also has a cohabitation-agreement pack. De facto spouses do not enter family patrimony by living together. This pack is the cohabitation track. Do not treat it as a marriage contract or as Swedish samboavtal.

The two instruments stay apart on purpose. A file titled prenup still has to be classified as a marriage contract or a cohabitation agreement based on whether the parties are married, about to marry, or unmarried, and on Quebec form.

marriage contract

Marriage contract.

formalitiesstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Marriage-contract form

A marriage contract is made by notarial act, except where the Code permits another form. This is not Ontario witnessing and not a U.S. acknowledgment.

  • Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
  • If the file calls itself a prenup, the formation question is still this province’s marriage-contract form, not California Fam. Code or Sambolagen.
acknowledgmentstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Witnesses, notaries, and acknowledgements

A marriage contract is made by notarial act, except where the Code permits another form. This is not Ontario witnessing and not a U.S. acknowledgment.

  • Québec marriage contracts are typically notarial acts. An Ontario-style two-witness page is the wrong formality story.
propertystatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Default property regime for spouses

Default regime is partnership of acquests unless a marriage contract chooses another permitted regime. Family patrimony (family residence, furniture, vehicles, certain retirement rights) is a separate public-order mass.

  • The contract’s job is usually to modify or confirm that default, within what the statute lets parties do.
  • Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.
permitted subjectsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

What this instrument can try to cover

A marriage contract typically addresses property, debts, and sometimes support between spouses. Public-order limits (Québec family patrimony; child support everywhere) still apply.

  • Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.
spousal supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Support language versus support law

Support between spouses follows the Code and federal divorce law where applicable. A marriage contract is not a complete substitute for support analysis.

  • Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.
child supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Children are not ordinary contract subjects

Child support and parental authority are not ordinary contractual subjects. Flag any child waiver.

  • Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.
voluntarinessstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Setting aside, disclosure, and advice

Family patrimony rules are of public order. Spouses cannot opt out of family patrimony by a marriage contract the way common-law provinces let spouses contract around equalization. Lesion, consent, and notarial formalities are the Québec questions—not s. 56(4) FLA.

  • Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
  • Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.
financial disclosurestatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Financial disclosure as a fairness fact

Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.

  • If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.
limitationsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

What this pack will not invent

Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.

  • Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
  • Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.
independent counselstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Independent legal advice

Canadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.

  • Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.
timingstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Timing around the wedding

A first draft delivered immediately before a wedding is a voluntariness and understanding fact. Canada does not use a single U.S.-style statutory waiting period in these packs.

  • Effective-date language in the contract is not proof the statutory regime attached on that date.

cohabitation agreement

Cohabitation agreement.

formalitiesstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Cohabitation-agreement form

De facto spouses may make private agreements about property they own, but those writings are not a marriage contract and do not create the family patrimony.

  • Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
  • If the file calls itself a prenup while the parties are unmarried, classify it against this province’s cohabitation rules rather than renaming it a marriage contract.
acknowledgmentstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Witnesses and proof of the cohabitation writing

De facto spouses may make private agreements about property they own, but those writings are not a marriage contract and do not create the family patrimony.

  • Witnessing, if required, is a provincial formality. It is not a U.S. notary acknowledgment statute.
propertystatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Default property position if unmarried

De facto spouses do not enter family patrimony by cohabiting. Property follows title, ordinary contract, and unjust-enrichment ideas a lawyer may assess—not the married spouses’ family patrimony.

  • Do not assume the couple is already in a spouse-like property statute. Read this province’s trigger.
  • Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.
permitted subjectsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

What this instrument can try to cover

A cohabitation agreement typically addresses property and debts between unmarried partners. It cannot manufacture a statutory regime the province does not confer, and it cannot replace a will.

  • Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.
spousal supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Support language versus support law

Support between spouses follows the Code and federal divorce law where applicable. A marriage contract is not a complete substitute for support analysis.

  • Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.
child supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Children are not ordinary contract subjects

Child support and parental authority are not ordinary contractual subjects. Flag any child waiver.

  • Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.
voluntarinessstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Setting aside, disclosure, and advice

Family patrimony rules are of public order. Spouses cannot opt out of family patrimony by a marriage contract the way common-law provinces let spouses contract around equalization. Lesion, consent, and notarial formalities are the Québec questions—not s. 56(4) FLA.

  • Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
  • Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.
financial disclosurestatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Financial disclosure as a fairness fact

Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.

  • If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.
limitationsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

What this pack will not invent

Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.

  • Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
  • Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.
independent counselstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Independent legal advice

Canadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.

  • Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.
timingstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Timing around cohabitation or a later wedding

A cohabitation agreement signed years into a relationship, or a 'prenup' signed while unmarried just before a wedding, raises classification and transition questions. Marriage usually moves the couple onto the marriage-contract / marital-property statute.

  • If the parties later marry, a cohabitation agreement does not automatically become a marriage contract unless this province’s statute and the document’s form actually support that continuation.

Common questions

What is the default property scheme for married spouses in Quebec?

Default regime is partnership of acquests unless a marriage contract chooses another permitted regime. Family patrimony (family residence, furniture, vehicles, certain retirement rights) is a separate public-order mass.

What happens for unmarried partners in Quebec if they never sign?

De facto spouses do not enter family patrimony by cohabiting. Property follows title, ordinary contract, and unjust-enrichment ideas a lawyer may assess—not the married spouses’ family patrimony.

What form does the writing have to take?

A marriage contract is made by notarial act, except where the Code permits another form. This is not Ontario witnessing and not a U.S. acknowledgment.

When can a court set the agreement aside?

Family patrimony rules are of public order. Spouses cannot opt out of family patrimony by a marriage contract the way common-law provinces let spouses contract around equalization. Lesion, consent, and notarial formalities are the Québec questions—not s. 56(4) FLA.

What about children and support?

Child support and parental authority are not ordinary contractual subjects. Flag any child waiver. Support between spouses follows the Code and federal divorce law where applicable. A marriage contract is not a complete substitute for support analysis.

Worked examples

A draft labelled prenup for Quebec

The useful question is whether it is a marriage contract or a cohabitation agreement given the parties’ status. Quebec sources are the only citations this page will use.

A clause copied from another province

Ontario equalization language, British Columbia excluded-property language, and Québec family-patrimony language are not interchangeable. Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.

Missing financial schedules

Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.

For a lawyer

  • Does this writing meet Quebec marriage-contract form?
  • Would Quebec treat these partners as spouses for property if they are unmarried?
  • What was disclosed, and who had independent advice?
  • Does any clause try to fix child support?