Checklist

Checklist: Quebec

One row per catalogued topic, for both instruments. An empty row is a package gap, not a claim that no law exists.

marriage contract

formalities

formalitiesstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Marriage-contract form

A marriage contract is made by notarial act, except where the Code permits another form. This is not Ontario witnessing and not a U.S. acknowledgment.

  • Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
  • If the file calls itself a prenup, the formation question is still this province’s marriage-contract form, not California Fam. Code or Sambolagen.

acknowledgment

acknowledgmentstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Witnesses, notaries, and acknowledgements

A marriage contract is made by notarial act, except where the Code permits another form. This is not Ontario witnessing and not a U.S. acknowledgment.

  • Québec marriage contracts are typically notarial acts. An Ontario-style two-witness page is the wrong formality story.

property

propertystatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Default property regime for spouses

Default regime is partnership of acquests unless a marriage contract chooses another permitted regime. Family patrimony (family residence, furniture, vehicles, certain retirement rights) is a separate public-order mass.

  • The contract’s job is usually to modify or confirm that default, within what the statute lets parties do.
  • Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.

permitted_subjects

permitted subjectsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

What this instrument can try to cover

A marriage contract typically addresses property, debts, and sometimes support between spouses. Public-order limits (Québec family patrimony; child support everywhere) still apply.

  • Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.

spousal_support

spousal supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Support language versus support law

Support between spouses follows the Code and federal divorce law where applicable. A marriage contract is not a complete substitute for support analysis.

  • Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.

child_support

child supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Children are not ordinary contract subjects

Child support and parental authority are not ordinary contractual subjects. Flag any child waiver.

  • Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.

voluntariness

voluntarinessstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Setting aside, disclosure, and advice

Family patrimony rules are of public order. Spouses cannot opt out of family patrimony by a marriage contract the way common-law provinces let spouses contract around equalization. Lesion, consent, and notarial formalities are the Québec questions—not s. 56(4) FLA.

  • Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
  • Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.

financial_disclosure

financial disclosurestatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Financial disclosure as a fairness fact

Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.

  • If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.

independent_counsel

independent counselstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Independent legal advice

Canadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.

  • Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.

timing

timingstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

Timing around the wedding

A first draft delivered immediately before a wedding is a voluntariness and understanding fact. Canada does not use a single U.S.-style statutory waiting period in these packs.

  • Effective-date language in the contract is not proof the statutory regime attached on that date.

limitations

limitationsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 391, 414–426, 431–443

What this pack will not invent

Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.

  • Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
  • Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.

cohabitation agreement

formalities

formalitiesstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Cohabitation-agreement form

De facto spouses may make private agreements about property they own, but those writings are not a marriage contract and do not create the family patrimony.

  • Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
  • If the file calls itself a prenup while the parties are unmarried, classify it against this province’s cohabitation rules rather than renaming it a marriage contract.

acknowledgment

acknowledgmentstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Witnesses and proof of the cohabitation writing

De facto spouses may make private agreements about property they own, but those writings are not a marriage contract and do not create the family patrimony.

  • Witnessing, if required, is a provincial formality. It is not a U.S. notary acknowledgment statute.

property

propertystatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Default property position if unmarried

De facto spouses do not enter family patrimony by cohabiting. Property follows title, ordinary contract, and unjust-enrichment ideas a lawyer may assess—not the married spouses’ family patrimony.

  • Do not assume the couple is already in a spouse-like property statute. Read this province’s trigger.
  • Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.

permitted_subjects

permitted subjectsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

What this instrument can try to cover

A cohabitation agreement typically addresses property and debts between unmarried partners. It cannot manufacture a statutory regime the province does not confer, and it cannot replace a will.

  • Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.

spousal_support

spousal supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Support language versus support law

Support between spouses follows the Code and federal divorce law where applicable. A marriage contract is not a complete substitute for support analysis.

  • Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.

child_support

child supportstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Children are not ordinary contract subjects

Child support and parental authority are not ordinary contractual subjects. Flag any child waiver.

  • Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.

voluntariness

voluntarinessstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Setting aside, disclosure, and advice

Family patrimony rules are of public order. Spouses cannot opt out of family patrimony by a marriage contract the way common-law provinces let spouses contract around equalization. Lesion, consent, and notarial formalities are the Québec questions—not s. 56(4) FLA.

  • Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
  • Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.

financial_disclosure

financial disclosurestatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Financial disclosure as a fairness fact

Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.

  • If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.

independent_counsel

independent counselstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Independent legal advice

Canadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.

  • Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.

timing

timingstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

Timing around cohabitation or a later wedding

A cohabitation agreement signed years into a relationship, or a 'prenup' signed while unmarried just before a wedding, raises classification and transition questions. Marriage usually moves the couple onto the marriage-contract / marital-property statute.

  • If the parties later marry, a cohabitation agreement does not automatically become a marriage contract unless this province’s statute and the document’s form actually support that continuation.

limitations

limitationsstatute

Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991 (de facto unions; no family patrimony)

What this pack will not invent

Do not apply Ontario FLA equalization, British Columbia FLA unmarried-spouse property, or U.S. UPAA formalities to Québec. French and English versions of the Code are official; this pack cites the English LégisQuébec text.

  • Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
  • Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.