Liste de contrôle

Liste : Yukon

Une rangée par sujet catalogue, pour les deux instruments. Une rangée vide est une lacune du dossier, pas une affirmation d'absence de loi.

contrat de mariage

formalities

formalitiesstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

Marriage-contract form

Domestic contracts under the Act are written. Territorial practice is not U.S. acknowledgment law and not Québec notarial form.

  • Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
  • If the file calls itself a prenup, the formation question is still this province’s marriage-contract form, not California Fam. Code or Sambolagen.

acknowledgment

acknowledgmentstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

Witnesses, notaries, and acknowledgements

Domestic contracts under the Act are written. Territorial practice is not U.S. acknowledgment law and not Québec notarial form.

  • Witnessing, if required, is a provincial formality. It is not a U.S. notary acknowledgment statute.

property

propertystatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

Default property regime for spouses

Family-property division is territorial. Do not use Ontario NFP worksheets or Québec patrimony categories.

  • The contract’s job is usually to modify or confirm that default, within what the statute lets parties do.
  • Territorial law is first-class in this catalog. Do not treat Yukon as 'probably like BC.'

permitted_subjects

permitted subjectsstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

What this instrument can try to cover

A marriage contract typically addresses property, debts, and sometimes support between spouses. Public-order limits (Québec family patrimony; child support everywhere) still apply.

  • Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.

spousal_support

spousal supportstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

Support language versus support law

The same statute addresses support. A property clause is not a complete support analysis.

  • Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.

child_support

child supportstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

Children are not ordinary contract subjects

Child support remains under child-support law.

  • Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.

voluntariness

voluntarinessstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

Setting aside, disclosure, and advice

Fairness, disclosure, and advice are lawyer questions under the Act and general law.

  • Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
  • Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.

financial_disclosure

financial disclosurestatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

Financial disclosure as a fairness fact

Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.

  • If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.

independent_counsel

independent counselstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

Independent legal advice

Canadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.

  • Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.

timing

timingstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

Timing around the wedding

A first draft delivered immediately before a wedding is a voluntariness and understanding fact. Canada does not use a single U.S.-style statutory waiting period in these packs.

  • Effective-date language in the contract is not proof the statutory regime attached on that date.

limitations

limitationsstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83

What this pack will not invent

Territorial law is first-class in this catalog. Do not treat Yukon as 'probably like BC.'

  • Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
  • Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.

contrat de vie commune

formalities

formalitiesstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

Cohabitation-agreement form

Because spouse can include unmarried partners who meet the Act’s cohabitation or child tests, a cohabitation agreement may sit inside the same statute as a marriage contract.

  • Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
  • If the file calls itself a prenup while the parties are unmarried, classify it against this province’s cohabitation rules rather than renaming it a marriage contract.

acknowledgment

acknowledgmentstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

Witnesses and proof of the cohabitation writing

Because spouse can include unmarried partners who meet the Act’s cohabitation or child tests, a cohabitation agreement may sit inside the same statute as a marriage contract.

  • Witnessing, if required, is a provincial formality. It is not a U.S. notary acknowledgment statute.

property

propertystatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

Default property position if unmarried

Yukon’s Family Property and Support Act uses a spouse definition that can include persons who have cohabited in a relationship of some permanence (commonly twelve months, or a child). Check the current definition in the cited Act rather than importing Ontario or BC numbers from memory.

  • Do not assume the couple is already in a spouse-like property statute. Read this province’s trigger.
  • Territorial law is first-class in this catalog. Do not treat Yukon as 'probably like BC.'

permitted_subjects

permitted subjectsstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

What this instrument can try to cover

A cohabitation agreement typically addresses property and debts between unmarried partners. It cannot manufacture a statutory regime the province does not confer, and it cannot replace a will.

  • Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.

spousal_support

spousal supportstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

Support language versus support law

The same statute addresses support. A property clause is not a complete support analysis.

  • Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.

child_support

child supportstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

Children are not ordinary contract subjects

Child support remains under child-support law.

  • Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.

voluntariness

voluntarinessstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

Setting aside, disclosure, and advice

Fairness, disclosure, and advice are lawyer questions under the Act and general law.

  • Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
  • Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.

financial_disclosure

financial disclosurestatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

Financial disclosure as a fairness fact

Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.

  • If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.

independent_counsel

independent counselstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

Independent legal advice

Canadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.

  • Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.

timing

timingstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

Timing around cohabitation or a later wedding

A cohabitation agreement signed years into a relationship, or a 'prenup' signed while unmarried just before a wedding, raises classification and transition questions. Marriage usually moves the couple onto the marriage-contract / marital-property statute.

  • If the parties later marry, a cohabitation agreement does not automatically become a marriage contract unless this province’s statute and the document’s form actually support that continuation.

limitations

limitationsstatute

Family Property and Support Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 83 (spouse can include unmarried partners)

What this pack will not invent

Territorial law is first-class in this catalog. Do not treat Yukon as 'probably like BC.'

  • Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
  • Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.