One row per catalogued topic, for both instruments. An empty row is a package gap, not a claim that no law exists.
marriage contract
formalities
formalitiesstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
Marriage-contract form
Domestic contracts under the Family Law Act are to be in writing, signed, and witnessed in the manner the Act requires.
Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
If the file calls itself a prenup, the formation question is still this province’s marriage-contract form, not California Fam. Code or Sambolagen.
acknowledgment
acknowledgmentstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
Witnesses, notaries, and acknowledgements
Domestic contracts under the Family Law Act are to be in writing, signed, and witnessed in the manner the Act requires.
Witnessing, if required, is a provincial formality. It is not a U.S. notary acknowledgment statute.
property
propertystatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
Default property regime for spouses
Matrimonial assets are divided under Part IV for qualifying spouses, with the Act’s own exemptions and home rules.
The contract’s job is usually to modify or confirm that default, within what the statute lets parties do.
Do not fold Newfoundland and Labrador into the Ontario FLA numbering even when the domestic-contract vocabulary looks similar.
permitted_subjects
permitted subjectsstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
What this instrument can try to cover
A marriage contract typically addresses property, debts, and sometimes support between spouses. Public-order limits (Québec family patrimony; child support everywhere) still apply.
Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.
spousal_support
spousal supportstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
Support language versus support law
Support can be contracted about, subject to later judicial override questions.
Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.
child_support
child supportstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
Children are not ordinary contract subjects
Child support and parenting are not ordinary contractual waivers.
Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.
voluntariness
voluntarinessstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
Setting aside, disclosure, and advice
The Act includes setting-aside language for domestic contracts, including disclosure and understanding. Independent legal advice is evidence, not a U.S. certificate form.
Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.
financial_disclosure
financial disclosurestatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
Financial disclosure as a fairness fact
Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.
If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.
independent_counsel
independent counselstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
Independent legal advice
Canadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.
Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.
timing
timingstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
Timing around the wedding
A first draft delivered immediately before a wedding is a voluntariness and understanding fact. Canada does not use a single U.S.-style statutory waiting period in these packs.
Effective-date language in the contract is not proof the statutory regime attached on that date.
limitations
limitationsstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2
What this pack will not invent
Do not fold Newfoundland and Labrador into the Ontario FLA numbering even when the domestic-contract vocabulary looks similar.
Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.
cohabitation agreement
formalities
formalitiesstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
Cohabitation-agreement form
The Act recognizes cohabitation agreements as a species of domestic contract. Formality still follows the Act, not U.S. acknowledgment statutes.
Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
If the file calls itself a prenup while the parties are unmarried, classify it against this province’s cohabitation rules rather than renaming it a marriage contract.
acknowledgment
acknowledgmentstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
Witnesses and proof of the cohabitation writing
The Act recognizes cohabitation agreements as a species of domestic contract. Formality still follows the Act, not U.S. acknowledgment statutes.
Witnessing, if required, is a provincial formality. It is not a U.S. notary acknowledgment statute.
property
propertystatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
Default property position if unmarried
Matrimonial-property Part IV is built around spouses in the married sense used by the Act. Unmarried partners may use a cohabitation agreement; they should not be assumed to have BC-style statutory family property after two years.
Do not assume the couple is already in a spouse-like property statute. Read this province’s trigger.
Do not fold Newfoundland and Labrador into the Ontario FLA numbering even when the domestic-contract vocabulary looks similar.
permitted_subjects
permitted subjectsstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
What this instrument can try to cover
A cohabitation agreement typically addresses property and debts between unmarried partners. It cannot manufacture a statutory regime the province does not confer, and it cannot replace a will.
Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.
spousal_support
spousal supportstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
Support language versus support law
Support can be contracted about, subject to later judicial override questions.
Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.
child_support
child supportstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
Children are not ordinary contract subjects
Child support and parenting are not ordinary contractual waivers.
Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.
voluntariness
voluntarinessstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
Setting aside, disclosure, and advice
The Act includes setting-aside language for domestic contracts, including disclosure and understanding. Independent legal advice is evidence, not a U.S. certificate form.
Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.
financial_disclosure
financial disclosurestatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
Financial disclosure as a fairness fact
Canadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.
If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.
independent_counsel
independent counselstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
Independent legal advice
Canadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.
Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.
timing
timingstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
Timing around cohabitation or a later wedding
A cohabitation agreement signed years into a relationship, or a 'prenup' signed while unmarried just before a wedding, raises classification and transition questions. Marriage usually moves the couple onto the marriage-contract / marital-property statute.
If the parties later marry, a cohabitation agreement does not automatically become a marriage contract unless this province’s statute and the document’s form actually support that continuation.
limitations
limitationsstatute
Family Law Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. F-2 (domestic contracts; unmarried property is not Ontario/BC)
What this pack will not invent
Do not fold Newfoundland and Labrador into the Ontario FLA numbering even when the domestic-contract vocabulary looks similar.
Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.