formalities
formalitiesstatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
Marriage-contract formPart 5 agreements must be in writing and signed by both spouses. Independent legal advice and disclosure are central to whether a court later sets an agreement aside under s. 93.
- Photos and unsigned templates are not a completed domestic contract.
- If the file calls itself a prenup, the formation question is still this province’s marriage-contract form, not California Fam. Code or Sambolagen.
acknowledgment
acknowledgmentstatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
Witnesses, notaries, and acknowledgementsPart 5 agreements must be in writing and signed by both spouses. Independent legal advice and disclosure are central to whether a court later sets an agreement aside under s. 93.
- Witnessing, if required, is a provincial formality. It is not a U.S. notary acknowledgment statute.
property
propertystatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
Default property regime for spousesPart 5 uses excluded property and family property, not Ontario net-family-property equalization. Agreements can address excluded property and reapportionment, within the Act.
- The contract’s job is usually to modify or confirm that default, within what the statute lets parties do.
- Do not analyze BC using Ontario FLA Part I or Québec family patrimony.
permitted_subjects
permitted subjectsstatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
What this instrument can try to coverA marriage contract typically addresses property, debts, and sometimes support between spouses. Public-order limits (Québec family patrimony; child support everywhere) still apply.
- Estate, beneficiary, and corporate-share clauses may need other instruments. Flag them as possibly outside this pack’s core statute.
spousal_support
spousal supportstatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
Support language versus support lawSpousal support agreements are assessed under the FLA and, where applicable, the Divorce Act. Do not treat a waiver as a result.
- Federal Divorce Act analysis for married spouses is a gap this pack flags rather than filling from memory.
child_support
child supportstatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
Children are not ordinary contract subjectsChild support is not an ordinary contractual exclusion. Flag any child-support language.
- Parenting time, custody labels, and child-support waivers should be routed to a lawyer. This product does not decide them.
voluntariness
voluntarinessstatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
Setting aside, disclosure, and advices. 93 addresses setting aside agreements, including failure to disclose, no independent legal advice, and significant unfairness. Hartshorne remains leading SCC authority on marriage agreements in a BC setting.
- Independent legal advice certificates, if attached, are evidence. They are not U.S. statutory forms and they do not decide the case.
- Financial schedules referenced but not in the upload are missing-exhibit questions, not proof of disclosure.
voluntarinesscourt opinion
Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2004 SCC 22
Hartshorne v. Hartshorne on marriage agreementsThe Supreme Court of Canada reviewed a British Columbia marriage agreement and how fairness is assessed when spouses contracted about property.
- The case is BC-specific in origin. Do not paste it into an Ontario s. 56(4) analysis as if the statutes were the same.
- It does not create a U.S.-style statutory counsel certificate.
financial_disclosure
financial disclosurestatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
Financial disclosure as a fairness factCanadian family agreements are often judged partly on whether each party knew the assets and debts. This pack does not invent a U.S. statutory disclosure exhibit list.
- If the contract recites schedules that are not in the file, say so. Do not invent net-worth numbers from intake.
independent_counsel
independent counselstatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
Independent legal adviceCanadian family agreements often stand or fall partly on whether each party could get advice. That is not a uniform statutory certificate across provinces, and Québec notarial counseling is a different professional model from common-law ILA letters.
- Absence of an ILA letter is not automatic invalidity. Presence of a letter is not automatic validity.
timing
timingstatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
Timing around the weddingA first draft delivered immediately before a wedding is a voluntariness and understanding fact. Canada does not use a single U.S.-style statutory waiting period in these packs.
- Effective-date language in the contract is not proof the statutory regime attached on that date.
limitations
limitationsstatute
Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, ss. 3, 81, 92–93
What this pack will not inventDo not analyze BC using Ontario FLA Part I or Québec family patrimony.
- Conflicts of laws if the couple later lives in another province or country are a gap.
- Tax, immigration, and Indigenous family-law systems are not fully catalogued here.